Business Requirements Document System Architecture

ATM Dispute Resolution Hub

Solution Designer

Magnus Allen

Target Line of Business

Deposit Operations

Problem Space

Manual Inefficiency

Status

Architecture Spec

ATM Dispute Workflow & Control Hub

Phased process map — 13 steps across 4 phases · responsive

Phase 1

Intake & Routing

01
Start / Trigger

Claim / Fallout Received

02
Control Point

Intake / Item Validation

03
Analyst Action

Cash / Check / ATM Classification

04
System / Tool

Queue Assignment

Phase 2

Research & Review

05
Handoff

Branch Fallout Review

06
Control Point

Ledger / Funds Research

07
Control Point

Evidence / Backup Review

08
◊ Decision

Exception / Escalation

Phase 3

Status & Controls

09
Analyst Action

Status Update / Queue Move

10
Control Point

EOD Eligibility Check

11
◊ Decision

Final Disposition

Approve · Deny · Escalate

Phase 4

Reporting & Feedback

12
Documentation

Reporting / Follow-Up

13
QA / Review

QA / Control Feedback

Start / Trigger Analyst Action Control Point ◊ Decision Documentation Cross-Functional Handoff System / Tool QA / Review

This workflow shows how fragmented ATM dispute work can be centralized into clearer intake, queue visibility, ledger review, documentation handling, EOD controls, and follow-up reporting.

💻 Launch Interactive Dispute Hub

What This Demonstrates

Queue visibility, documentation controls, ledger/funds exposure awareness, EOD operational discipline, and cross-functional remediation.